|
reYKCuf (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The truth is out there.
PushingDaisies7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i didnt use to like star trek but i heard the 2009 movie was being directed by j.j. abrahms, who created great shows like lost and fringe and i thoughti would give star trek a try. i saw a old rerun of the original series and have been hooked ever since.
I AM PROUD TO BE A TREKKIE !!!
Lurker15 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
In the Past 40 year of Star Trek Returns in 2009
Malachiah (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So in conclusion, this movie, by retelling (or rebooting) the events of the the original NCC-1701, is well placed chronologically in regards to the franchise. Moreover, you have a fresh crew learning their way into the 'human adventure', composed of a new generation of actors, coupled with well-played CGI (for space, explosions, and virtual environments, what else could you have?), with action that's be delivered to us by J.J. Abrams - of whom, I will say, no movie or series ever bombed.
Malachiah (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Someone said here the movie will flop, but I think differently.
First off, it's Star Trek, a series which was held in our minds and acclaimed for decades. In case there's any doubts, you have the Trekkie community.
Second, you have the continuing of the series with TNG. Then, the spin-offs, such as DS9 and Voyager. All acclaimed down till the end.
Third, the Enterprise series; it was the shortest, but it tells events leading down to the formation of the Federation. Again, acclaimed.
JessicaParker50 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I Bet I Can Make You Blush
fastsexfinder(dot)(com)
playfulsinfulbabe66 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
... A Little Time In My Room
fastloverfun . com
hjaeko (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
dont sound so theatrical.
vgmaster9 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nevermind, you just don't get it.
Zenutheduck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As with the past 40 years of Star Trek, good job. |
