|
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And from the androvo culture of central asia the proto-indo-iranics would later go down back to BMAC and the indus valley region and influence the languages in their original homeland. But with all this being said this video does not give all the full detail information and is missing out the point of some facts.
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They would also be the first so called proto-indo-european languages that split off from proto-indo-ranian and that would later spread to other parts of europe influencing other linguistic groups as slavic,baltic germanic languages and gaulic-celtic languages and romance languages which french is part of the wider northern romance linguistic languages whichi is a gaulic-romance language which has roots with mostly celtic and desended from romance or later romans influence in the region....
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
These people were the scythians that first appeared and migrated to europe in 2000BC in the black sea region and bringing their Indo-iranian culture from the south east of original BMAC and also indus valley civilzations and some near eastern and armenian and some meditteranean greek cultures and pre-turkic speaking antolian cultures forming the Catacomb culture in presnt day Ukraine. and from there forming the the mixed culture of already eastern and native european slavic cultures....
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
which many original meditterranean iranic and some indo-indian stock peoples from the BMAC and indus valley would leave to northern central asia and bring the first actual existing of not only proto-indo-iranic languages in the Andronovo culture in 2000BC but also later the proto-indo-european languages that formed in eastern europe in the black sea region from the migration of the original mediterranean iranic peoples or sometimes known as true aryans would first go to europe and first appear..
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Since the oldest recorded languages of an hyphotetical proto-indo-european languages were in the BMAC and indo-pakistani region. that before proto-indo-iranic languages coming into existing. the oldest cultures were in those regions of BMAC and indus valley. that from many near easterners influneced from the west influenced the BMAC in addition to them the indo-pakistani people also influenced the region which many original meditterranean iranic stock peoples from the BMAC would leave to....
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's a matter of early linguists preception that parsi or farsi is not semitic. and the concept of semitic comes from the torah. so in other words the concept of semitc languages and iranic languages is useless it should be (Near Eastern languages) as opposed to anything else. but one other thing the hyphotetical proto-indo-european languages which means indo-indian and majority languages of europe and some near eastern languages would all have some connection with indo-pakistan region and BMAC
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
But even with that being said the idea of an proto-indo-european language is more controversial then proto-indo-iranic because apparently there are some influcnes in both indian languages and iranic languages including farsi or persian. but you need to remember that the pronunciatian the sounds the vocabulary words whether arabic or persian are not that similar to indo-indian languages. it has always been similar to the ancient surrounding semitic languages.
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Even though farsi is considerd an indo-iranian language or even sometimes known as the broader indo-european languages it has never had any significant similarities with any indo-indian languages including sanskrit and never any type of influence with any anglo-european languages of europe. except for the meditterranean languages such as ancient greek and ancient italic latin languages of italy from the romans of southern europe to a lesser extent.but even with that the idea of an indo-european
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Which we persians are desended of the elamites whose language became changed from elamite to persian. during the middle of the parthian dynasty the rest of the remaining elamite speakers gave up their language to their new language parsi-persian. parsi which today is known as farsi in iran or persia has always been similar to the languages of it's neigbors such as babylonian, akkadian and aramaic and elamite. and with sanskrit to a lesseer extent and ancient greek.even though farsi is considered
shootoul (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The indo-aryan speaking peoples are a large group of people of indo-indian-dravidian descent from the indus valley that had some influences on their languages by proto-iranic speakers based on many linguists belief. the afghans are desended of the original proto-iranic speakers of these languages in their own land. which they are known as eastern iranic peoples and the persians and many others such as kurds, laks, lurs, bakhtiaris and balochs are western iranic speaking peoples.which we persians |
